Download Fidelizer Explore Nimitra
Are you computer audiophile? If so, Fidelizer will help you enjoy the music on computer even more.

Author Archive for Windows X

Introducing Fidelizer Mod “Masterpiece”, proper flagship mod for true affordable highend upgrade

 

Fidelizer Mod - Masterpiece

 

Fidelizer Ultimate Mod may deliver the maximum potentials of modding possibilities from trying all possibilities and choose the best combination. But what do you get as results? $899.95? $499.95? I could have modded AK380Cu and Sony WM1Z with that money!

When I think about how some companies charge $700 for modding $599 device, they probably think the same about my Fidelizer Ultimate Mod. Most people who could have afforded $500 mod would have purchased $1,000 DAP already or get flagship DAP instead of DX200 + Ultimate Mod.

 

Although Ultimate Mod is successful according to clients who purchased, it barely helps community so I decided to change my approach to support community better. Something that can really bring affordable highend performance to most owners.

Instead of upgrading everything that is possible no matter how big or small improvement is, I focus on testing and choosing the most optimal parts to be improved, revise the design and implementation to deliver the highest price / performance ratio.

Assuming Fidelizer Ultimate Mod has 100% performance index, this new “Masterpiece” concept can deliver most of best performance like 80-90% with modding cost at 40-50% lowered which is much more affordable for audiophiles who really want to upgrade.

 

At the moment Fidelizer Mod Masterpiece will be available for iBasso and Fiio DAPs with new lineup and AMP module extension only. I’ll gradually add devices I’ve modded before in Portable Products page later once I finish preparations and I also accept modding request outside listing too. 🙂

Future of Fidelizer Mod – Moving on from Ultimate Mod concept

 

Fidelizer Mod - AK380CuAu & Sony WM1Z

 

My first Fidelizer Mod project started from AK240 era when my friend in community sent me iBasso DX90 to apply firmware modification for better sound quality. He saw my research projects on attempt to make audiophile Android tablet/phone from devices with Wolfson audio chipset.

At that time I was bored with portable products and stopped seeking for DAPs, which is normal occurrence for audiophiles who started building serious highend systems. I was so serious to the point that I both Esoteric P-03/D-03 and Emm Labs CDSD/DCC2 SE at the same time for over a year.

Given that seriousness, I found portable DAPs sounding unacceptable due to many limitations and limited experience of designer so I stopped my pursuit after iRiver P20 (best DAP before iRiver was rebranded to Astell and Kern).

 

Since I also modified my own highend digital sources too, my friend decided that it’s OK if I can modify DX90 hardware too if it can help improve sound quality. So I look onto this DAP and realized I could implement Emm Labs’ design into this DAP and maybe it can be my dream DAP I’m searching.

The result blew me away. It’s like having Emm Labs DAP in my hand as portable device. At that time modding was around $200 and that alone was enough to outperform AK240 and others in the market. My friends asked me if I can improve further so I started doing research for Ultimate Mod.

As a result, I ended up creating $500 mod for iBasso DX90 with all opamps upgraded from the best selected and tested in market, caps are upgraded with finest quality including my signature orange caps, and clock modules are all replaced with best one I can find for this iBasso DX90.

 

At that time everyone was OK to pay for $500 modding iBasso DX90 that they can buy at cheaper price because they heard my works and sound quality is good enough to have tens of $500 mod in Thailand market where modding above $100 is too expensive for most people.

However, people who live outside Thailand can’t get to hear my works before making a decision so it’s really hard to make a decision for Fidelizer Ultimate Mod that costs around the same price of device without listening experience.

Also, I later realized it’s not very practical for most people to buy $250-400 DAPs new or used and spend like $500 on modding like Fiio X5iii even though it’s worth purchasing for my clients but it just doesn’t make sense for most people to spend money on modding more than product itself.

 

These thoughts have been lingering in my mind for a long while and you can see that I haven’t updated anything about Fidelizer Mod at all despite modding almost all highend DAPs in market including AK380/WM1Z recently. I’ve been thinking deeply about the future of Fidelizer Mod in next year.

When I finished making the best mod of AMP8 with all capacitors upgraded and tuned with different values and brands including opamps and stuff, my friend who have DX200 Ultimate Mod device said it’s too expensive for $200 amp card which costed me about the same of modding DX200 body.

So making Ultimate Mod might be the best thing I can do and it maybe worthy of its high price. However, can it really help product owners enjoying under $1k DAP with Ultimate Mod? Maybe it’s time to change the approach about delivering affordable highend sound to portable products.

Fidelizer Pro purchase options bugs are now fixed

After ending 3,300th purchase offer campaign. I wondered why people kept ordering Plus version and not a single person bought Pro version recently. Today I received a message from client saying he can’t purchase Pro version today. It seems WordPress auto text correction bug strikes again.

Now I’ve fixed Fidelizer Pro purchase options and you should be able to purchase Fidelizer Pro license and other upgrade options as before. If you purchase Fidelizer Plus recently and want to upgrade to Pro version, you can purchase “From Plus to Pro” option at $30 USD in Fidelizer Pro’s section.

I’m truly sorry for this bug to happen again. I wonder if it’s possible to disable auto text correction feature in editor. I tried to change in text mode only every time now but sometimes it still cut options in form.

Correction: Roon Rock OS isn’t Windows emulator nor emulation from Windows environment

Since I published my article yesterday about Roon Rock OS, I noticed my headline has misleading title as Mono is open source platform to emulate what .NET runtime does in other platforms like Linux/Mac. It’s not conveyed properly and some may understand Mono as .NET runtime emulator so I apologize for this mistake.

I also have my own misunderstanding about Roon development that it was based on Windows with expansion to support Mac/Linux through Mono. Last night Mr. Danny Dulai, one of Roon’s founders shared his insights to correct my misunderstandings.

He said Roon was firstly developed on Linux and MacOS using Mono so my assumption to say Roon is based on Windows is incorrect. So my opinion of Roon Rock OS as to emulate what Roon does in Windows is incorrect and I’d like to apologize again for stating as emulator. It was rude of me.

Mr. Danny Dulai is truly a gentleman developer. He came to provide facts to correct the mess I created in calm and composed manner which is really rare to find from software developers. I truly respect him for passion of his work and his attitude.

As I already stated in my previous article, I believe Mr. Danny Dulai and his team did what could possibly be best to share Roon experience in Linux. I however will stand on Windows side because .NET runtime still has better garbage collection and I believe that’ll affect audio performance.

Let’s exam Roon Rock OS – Windows emulator in Linux clothing

Correction: Roon Rock OS isn’t Windows emulator nor emulation from Windows environment

 

Most people probably know me as a Windows guy but I actually took all possibilities to improve computer audio including Mac and Linux too. I wouldn’t be able to push 100% positive feedback on Fidelizer Purist ROM for Android ROM without intensive research on Linux OS.

Today I decided to explore what’s inside Roon ROCK and see if I can improve Roon Rock image with optimizations based on my research from Linux’s audiophile OS optimizations. We’ll start exploring with Linux Reader and you also need program to unpack tar.gz file too.

 

Roon Rock - 01

 

There’s Linux ROONRESET partition and FAT16 CUSTOM_ROON partition. Inside ROONRESET has bootfs.img.gz for ROON OS installation loader I guess. After extracting and opening bootfs inside, It was named ROONBOOT. In there, it looks like ROONRESET but this time we have roonos-1 folder which looks like this.

 

Roon Rock - 02

 

This seems to be RoonOS partition to be cloned to Intel NUC’s device. there’s rootfs.img so it should contain something worth examing for further improvements. Let’s open rootfs.img and see how it looks like. I’m sure it’d be great.

 

Roon Rock - 03

 

Unallocated? That’s weird. But there’s no error during mounting process. Maybe it’s unsupported partition? Wait. There’s another CUSTOM_ROON partition from Roon Rock image too. Maybe this is an empty partition waiting to be created from there?

 

Roon Rock - 04

 

And there’s roon.tar.bz2 file. There’s nothing inside identity folder. Let’s extract roon.tar.bz2 file and see what’s inside. RoonServer folder? Cool! Let’s jump into it and see how Roon OS works!

 

Roon Rock - 05

 

RoonMono? Mono? It’s not what I’m guessing right? This can’t be real, right? Just to be sure, let’s open Server folder and see how it looks like.

 

RoonRock - 06

 

It seems Roon Rock OS is a Linux with Mono runtime running RoonServer’s .NET code through Mono platform. MacOS version also use the same principles too and works pretty well with MacOS support through Mono.

That aside, I think it’s good idea to run Windows .NET runtime emulation software rather than making a Linux port that can be worse than main code they wrote in main code if not done right. Mono is quite powerful. Maybe not as good as .NET Runtime in Windows but getting better over time.

As for possiblity of Fidelizer optimizations on Roon Rock OS, maybe I can optimize kernel and ramdisk image with some tweaks I can apply, insert some optimizations in startup script to further improve Linux OS environment, adjust Mono configuration, etc.

But I think the best way to optimize is to moved from Windows emulation platform to native Windows platform. Running real Windows with Windows environment optimizations should be better than optimizing Linux environment to emulate what Windows does better.